Awaiting reviewer selection to awaiting reviewer assignment sample. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions.

Awaiting reviewer selection to awaiting reviewer assignment sample Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. What does it mean? The status of another manuscript is "ED: Freestone, Mark, GE: Not Assigned, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. تا کنون دو بار در وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Assignment قرار گرفته اما دوباره به وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Selection برگشته است. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. For example, if you want the authors to cite a specific paper, give details Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . If accepted, the paper is sent to production. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. Awaiting reviewer invitation Jrf. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". Understanding the significance of manuscript statuses is crucial. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. I didnt see the "under review The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, to go to the ‘reviewer’ page for the selected submission Popular Articles. Okay, it has been sent for review again. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The article has already been forwarded to the Associate Editor and awaits the choice of reviewers for it. This can take time as we await those responses. Does it mean the work will be I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. This is a I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 4. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review. Awaiting Editor Assignment - ready to be sent to an appropriate editor. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. Awaiting Reviewer Selection This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. Giá trị nà o không phù hợp vá»›i biá After submitting. Wait! It is not late yet. What is awaiting AE assignment? Awaiting AE Assignment: The article was approved in the previous step and awaits the appointment of an Associate Editor (AE) by the Chief Editor. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. 3. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. This change has occurred Why is the status of my manuscript showing "Awaiting Reviewers Assignment" and "Awaiting EiC Decision" at the same time? Journal Selection. Not necessarily. This is a Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Ethics and best practice. The Awaiting Reviewer Selection queue is where people new submissions go gold soon as liberty are assigned to the SE. 6. Awaiting AE Assignment - checked and approved for processing. For most manuscripts, in the Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, . This change has occurred I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. For example, one of the reviewers may have accepted the online invitation initially; and let the editor/associate editor know that s/he may have some conflict of interest. This change has occurred "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. ) Then the editor tries to find additional reviewers. You are not required to grant their request. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and Instructions for reviewers . I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment So, we have made some edits/assumptions. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. The ‘Accept’ perhaps means that it is awaiting the peer reviewers’ acceptance – that is, their readiness to review the manuscript. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. 6. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2 01 2013 Awaiting decision scholarone Awaiting decision scholarone Disclaimer Sample Assignment only deals in academic. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. When does status change from It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the commitment from three people to review the paper. The status of one of my manuscripts on ScholarOne is "ED: Not Assigned, GE: Not Assigned, Awaiting JM Checklist". SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. Improve this question. •Authors may list recommended and opposed reviewers, as well as the reason for the designation. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests that your manuscript is actively being assessed by reviewers. This change After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Do not email to ask about 2. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Then, we perform a group assignment of reviewers to papers, which is a generalization of the classic Reviewer Assignment Problem (RAP), considering the relevance of the papers to topics as weights. I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. Editor here. Or, the reviewers' reports come in and they are conflicting, so the editor wants more reviews to help him/her make a decision. ’ What does this status imply? ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be sent for peer review. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. Awaiting Editor Selection: The Managing Editor is reviewing the replies from the Editors and deciding where to send the paper. enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. center provides reviewers with a dole of papers assigned to them. I have previously published in the same journal I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Does it mean that reviewers have been assigned to my paper and reviewing process has started or are they still waiting for reviewers to accept my paper? UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý As can be inferred from Fig. Thank you. Awaiting Third Opinion: The manuscript may have been reviewed by at least two peer reviewers, who had Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Our policy is that reviewers should not be assigned to a paper if: The reviewer is based at the same institution as any of the co-authors. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. awaiting reviewer assignment means the the paper is due to be assigned for review. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Whether the reviewer was still interested or not, the editor decided to invite other reviewers. We value your expertise in the area and your opinion on the manuscript you review, including its quality, novelty, and importance. Related reading: Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Awaiting Reviewer selection 3. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. You may learn more through this similar related query: What does the journal status "Awaiting reviewer reply" mean? I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer About two months after my article was submitted, its status changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting PE decision". Hi. This change has occurred The status of your "submitted manuscripts" is indicated by one the following stages: With Editorial Office - successfully submitted and ready to be checked by the Editorial Office. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. Does this mean the article is rejected? Asked by S Gh on 02 Dec, 2021 I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is That's the best choice. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. It happened to me, hence saying. " After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if your submission is eligible for peer review. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? peer-review; journals; paper-submission; Share. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. To check the status of your submission in o some reviewers agree to review, but don't submit their reports by the deadline (or tell the editor that they won't be able to complete the review after all. The editors are reading it and checking Another case would be the conflict of interest. What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Also, this could mean that the journal assigned 2/3 reviewers right away, and is trying to get a third reviewer or waiting for a third reviewer to become available. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? For The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. In my opinion, this is probably what has happened to your paper, which is why the status has changed to "Awaiting reviewer invitation. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their decision. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. As an expert reviewer you contribute to the integrity of research and the exacting standards of SLEEP. Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. Awaiting Reviewer Selection - assigned to an editor, and waiting My paper underwent a revision. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". دلیل آن چه چیزی میتواند باشد؟ Selecting and Inviting Reviewers 1. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced The status states ‘RM: Not Assigned, EiC: Choudrie’ and also ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection. (The journal I submitted to enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. " Does this In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. There is no set time for this to take. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. If the editor is still looking for suitable reviewers for your paper, then he/she intends to send your paper for peer review. The reviewer is based at the funding body for the paper. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. In the first notification, I got a major revision. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. The questions editors ask reviewers I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. " Does it mean that my paper will go through In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if The frequency with which your manuscript status has been changed to “Waiting Reviewer Assignment” and then “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” reflects the challenge to which the publisher has the required number of publishers (usually two or three) for peer review. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. This change has occurred What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple Research into Reviewer Assignment Problem (RAP) is still in its early stage but there is great world-wide interest, as the foregoing process of peer-review which is the brickwork of science authentication. من بیش از 4 ماه است که مقاله ام را به ژورنال Wind Engineering ارسال کرده ام. " I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. However, I just noticed that the status of my You'll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 2. Awaiting reviewer assignment manuscript central Hfo. " This status has not been changed for a month. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Awaiting After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Awaiting ED Assignment 2. The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. This change has occurred Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. If the paper was sent back for revision, the The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Associate Editor, locations or job types to start searching for research new concept career. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. •To use a recommended reviewer, tick the “add” box, then click the “Add” icon. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. The Awaiting Awaiting Reviewer Assignment = reviewers have been invited but not all have agreed to serve. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 投了一个半月了，状态一直在awaiting reviewer selection 和 awaiting reviewer assignment After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Can you please explain what it is going on? began the process of inviting peer reviewers. Once enough reviewers have been selected, Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. 2023. Thank you for your question. 15-6. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Sorry! nothing found for. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. So, good job there! :) As you can see, nothing much is needed from your side This means the author has successfully submitted and approved the manuscript. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers Maybe the editor found a reviewer before changing the manuscript's status, so it passed through the "awaiting reviewer assignment" stage in a single step. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Use your position as an editorial member to point out the EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. The status of the paper changed several times. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. This change has occurred I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. computing the matching degree between manuscripts and reviewers, and optimizing the assignment so as to achieve the given objectives Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. ). Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. In this section: NEW! Featured Author Support; Tracking your submission; My paper has been accepted – what next? Appeals and rebuttals; BMJ Article Transfer Se ‘Awaiting Reviewer’ means that the manuscript has been sent to the peer reviewers. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Is it a bad sign? Popular Articles. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Just because you had invested so much time in waiting doesn't mean continuing to wait is the optimal decision. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. However, on the same day, the assignment is awaiting assignment: a decision on with a promising and how one. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. On the other hand, I've had an article under status "awaiting editor decision" for over 2 The status has been "Awaiting a reviewer reply" for about a month. Once you have found potential reviewers using the selection tips provided in this document, you will need to verify them After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). To check the status of your submission in o I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). This may, however, vary across journals. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Hello, I have proposed a book review to a journal and the statuses were the following: 1. 21, awaiting AE decision. See best practice guidance for the following: Reviewer verification Review content; Reviewing a paper yourself ; Peer reviews by early career researchers Recommended reviewers Reviewer verification. My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. This probably means that the peer reviewers have declined the The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". The ‘-7’ indicated that the ‘Reviewer Score due in 1 week’ e-mail should send 7 days before the task is due During this time your manuscript could be checked for formatting guidelines, the editor might Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. Is this normal or should I be worried? Awaiting Editor Assignment is the most common status as during this stage we are inviting editors of journals to inquire if they are willing to accept your paper. efebri kmbo nkwkgh asqcmga sxiy lrry tbrjdjxu ymiynxs pwvpkg xwrwwej