1080p vs 4k tv reddit. 24 votes, 94 comments.

1080p vs 4k tv reddit Each season streaming from Prime in 4K takes around 180GB (~41mbps) of bandwidth and that is more raw data than 3 double layer Blu-Ray discs at full capacity and Blu-Ray uses pretty much the same video compression methods as Prime streaming. . I haven't noticed much of a difference to be honest and before anyone says anything about tv quality. Vs the Apple TV outputting 4k resolution to your tv, thus it doesn't touch it. 1 capabilities, you can play 4k @ 120hz. Change the output resolution to 1080p in Apple TV settings, then the TVs getting a non 4k signal to upscale. However, if you have a really good 4K TV, it can make HDR pop significantly more than colors on a regular 1080p Blu-ray so it really depends. Posted by u/GM75 - 13 votes and 18 comments We have a 4K 65" TV. If i play the same 4k movie on it, it will look very washed out. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 1080p, 1440p or 4K on a 4K TV display comments. They're just more fun. No amount of downvotes will change the truth and fact of the matter. From others replies in the post it seems that Nvidia Shield devices do the same thing. The 4k is HDR, and this isn't just this one movie. In long - I bought a preowned desktop a few months ago, I3-9100F and 1660 super, struggles to hold 60 frames at 4k in Tarkov/Warzone. To ensure access to 1080p Enhanced and the best possible viewing experience, we recommend you upgrade to a 4K-compatible streaming device. It explains when it’s worth it to keep your old 1080p tv vs. My 1080p plasma still looks great today but many people are running awful 1080p LCD TVs from a decade ago. 7 million pixels 2160p is 8. You can do a 4k HDR to 4k SDR conversion in Plex, but it's a whole big resource taxing hog to do so. 1080p. 1440p to 4k is a significant jump in clarity but to me it doesn't "feel" as big of a jump as 1080p to 1440p or at least doesn't feel worth it a lot of the time when you take the bigger performance hit into account. I didn't notice the difference even between 1080p and 4k in that video. The Xbox 360 is equipped with a output scaling chip, that will take your internal render and scale it to fit whatever resolution screen you want between 480i and 1080p. 4K can be decent, if you disable most of the TV’s upscaling features. I heard reviews that 4K compatible games look amazing! Also, so many streaming services and movies are being formatted to 4K that pretty soon it’ll be the norm. It should also run a bit cooler. I have a 4k 60 inch TV mounted on the wall (the imput lag is somewhat tolerable but I don't think it have some special upscaling chip like some other tv do ) and was wondering how to play on lower resolutions 2k/1080p in a way that wouldn't look too bad . Not even close. Now, regadring your 4K question. My telly is 3-4 meters away from me and 2gb files with 1080p 0. Wildlands, BF1, and Red Dead Redemption (recently 'Enhanced') look incredible. Although 4K is still a large improvement over 1080p. That is to say if you buy a 120Hz TV it will have all sorts of other bells and whistles like great HDR, low input lag and so on, which will probably wow you more than 120Hz. I tried playing some of my games like Xdefiant (just yesterday) in 1080p and 4k at 27" but I definitely would go for 4K. The extra workroom in 4k can be nice, and yes it's night and day vs 1080p. 99. In short, will a 1080p/1440p monitor look as good as a 4k, 65" TV? My eyesight sucks and would like to have the same clarity. To ultimate users, did you see a marked difference in quality playing in 4k over the 1080p lower tier subscription? Locked post. Sometimes the 4K stream might have Atmos vs 5. I am not sure, but I think, that would be pushing it for 1080P. Generally I shoot at 4k 24 fps on both my camera and iPhone. Its a huge difference. 1080p TV’s are slowly making their way out the door as more and more things convert to 4K. I play on pc with a ginormous TV cause I came from console. Depends on bitrate used. (FSR to 4k) Put the Steam Deck display resolution as 4k. This is a screenshot of a computer connected to a Sony VPL-295ES. The only reason I bought a new Sony 4K 120hz tv was because I scored a ps5 at retail price and figured it’d be dumb to play it on a regular 1080p tv 42 votes, 49 comments. A lot of it is filmed in 2K, cropped to 1080p, and then upscaled which won't look anything near as good as native 4K. The thing is you can get 4k60 on any old bum ass TV, whereas 120Hz is only on the higher end TVs, so it's not really a fair comparison. com Apr 20, 2022 · I have gamed at 1080p on both a 4k 55" and 65" OLED TV's. It also heavily depends on the compression of the files. As others have said, it's only worth it if you have a good 4K HDR TV. I don't bother with 4K files either. I don't have a direct comparison to a 1080p 55/65" TV but I felt the scaling was spot on, I couldn't see any problem. The 1080p version is available in a shop near me right now for £22 brand new, whereas the 4k version is twice the price. And the rare internal vs upscaled comparisons all use TAA as a base. I think a 1080p TV will do just fine if you don’t want to make the 4K upgrade just yet. I’ve played my PS3 on all three types. If the 4k TV also had HDMI 2. Without an HDR capable TV, you are not seeing the true capability of the One S right now. Viewers can navigate to video quality settings at any time to update their preferred setting. There are cameras that upscale footage to higher resolutions. Can’t tell the difference. If anything, go for a 2. 6 inches. When I rip a HDR 4K blue ray as a backup and for playback from my Plex server, as I have an 4K OLED tv, I can choose to encode to 2160p with HDR or 1080p with HDR. 1080p resolution, also known as Full HD, has a resolution of 1920×1080 pixels, while 4K resolution, also known as Ultra HD, has a resolution of 3840×2160 pixels. Or for repeat watches. Come bros, you have to have ALL points of the broadcast to be in 4K . This means the deck will render the game at 720p, then upscales it to 1080p using FSR (which will look better than 720p) and your TV will receive a 1080p signal and "upscales" it to its 4k panel. Blu-rays output at 1080p. Reply reply Watching something like a 4K demo on YouTube is honestly like looking through a window and is very comparable to my 4K quantum dot tv upstairs from a proper distance for definition. A lot of them think these subs are a real representation of the real world, but the majority of PC gamers are on 1080p (same with me) and probably don't see a need to change from 1080p (also, same with me). Nothing is stopping you from playing at 4k on a 1080p screen where you will enjoy most of the visual benefits, it won't be as crisp of an image but If your 1080p monitor can play 4K (mine can't, as video stutters if I try), then definitely choose 4K, unless you've other reasons not to (like huge filesize, etc). But you also need like 2x the GPU performance to run the 4k 144Hz monitor. You just have to ask yourself which one you want. Help preserve chips. The scaling has zero effect on performance or the internal resolution. You need better internet. Depends on the quality of your 1080p monitor and the quality of whatever 4k set you were going to purchase. Depending on the game, some of them look really good even at that resolution, while others are too blurry even for my not-so-pixel-coounting taste. I'm in the market to buy a 4k tv and I would like to know yalls exp on how games look being downscaled vs playing at the native resolution of the monitor My system is not amazing but it can handle 1440p/1080p no problem some games maybe even 4k Ryzen 5 2600 Rtx 2060 32 gb ram I'm looking into a tv so I can watch tv and movies on it and also A 4K laptop will look a lot better than a 1080p laptop even at 15. The new 65" 4K OLED's are way out of my price range. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I have an old 2013/14 tv and its unbearably slow because shitty processor, considering buying a fire stick since its the cheapest and most trustworthy and available option where i live, but the 4k option is a bit more expensive where i live (314 brl for standard or 62 usd vs 449 brl or 90 usd for 4k) which one should i buy if my tv doesnt have 4k functionality? I'm on the founders tier, so I'm maxed out at 1080p on my 4k TV. 1440p definitely look better, but since i don't own 4K screen i can't state how far the difference. The distance from a small laptop screen is so close you would not actually see the true difference between a 2k and 4k. Pixel shifting is indistinguishable from native 4K at recommended distances (ie 10ft from 100"). Quite frankly though most cheapish/budget 4k TV suck for gaming, with low refresh rates, inbuilt postprocessing and lack of gaming features like VRR. My monitor history: Used a cheap 1080p 60hz IPS for 5 years-> PG279Q 1440p 165hz IPS for 1 year (RMA issues) -> back to that old 1080p for a month -> now currently driving a LG 27GN950 160hz 4k monitor. But it's not like I can run 4K native ANYWAY. Reply reply Kronny77 So I've been looking into getting a Chromecast with Google TV. 1 on disc though. When I crop in in 4k though, the image holds and I can crop much further into my shot without really losing any quality. I'm planning on a RTX 4080/upcoming 4080 SUPER build and am debating between going for a 32" 1440p monitor vs a 42/43" 4K TV. I already have poor vision as is, changing from 1080p to 1440p or even 4k would make no visual difference to me. But BenQ HT2050a is an exceptional project though. As for series, since there are several episodes or even seasons, I do not see why they should be kept in 4K, as 1080p should be enough. 1080p is still going to be more than fine though. 3 million pixels. They are comparing 4K to 1080p, not your 200% crop 4K vs 1080p and they are missing the whole question. 1080p is 2 million pixels 1440p is is 3. He isn't near as picky as I am (at least yet, lol). Currently, 1080p is the basic accepted HD resolution standard, but more and more electronics are trying to push for 1440p minimum. you might as well just continue on with your 1080p screen. There's no definitive answer. But here's the thing: Even on a 1080p TV, if you choose quality mode, the PS5 will still render the frames in 4K, but will downsample them to 1080p to fit your screen. I'm sure I could just change some settings and get it up to par with the 1080p levels, but I'm wondering why it's so much darker. I could have gone with a 55-65" solid 4K TV, or my 92" 1080p projector. And compared to 1080p TAA, even 4K UP is competitive. I'm considering two TVs: the Insignia 43-inch LED 4K UHD TV andInsignia 43-inch LED 4K UHD TV the TCL 32-inch 1080p LED TV. I've just never bothered to upgrade it over the years and I have a decent computer monitor for games. You’re missing out on that Apple-like sharpness, and usually 4K panels have other benefits like better brightness or contrast. Source: https://www. Just curious if this is will be the case with SF6 I'm still using an old 26 inch 1080P TV which has always looked terrible. 5 feet away from a 55 inch OLED B9, and switching between Blue Planet 2 on Netflix (TV using 4K and Firestick 4K at 1080p) no one has yet been able to see the difference. FSR then in performance mode tells your gpu to render back in 1080p and the uses an algorithm to estimate the missing pixels to get to 4k, as opposed to just blowing up the 1080p to fit the 4k screen copying each pixel 4 times to reach the right size 1080 to 4k I think I could see (pardon the pun) due to the ever increasing screen size. A 1080p vs 4K hdr file doesn’t always look super different in modern movies, especially when the 1080p has a good bit rate. Even the type of hdmi cable on newer TVs is different. What they found was that when viewed on a 4K monitor, 1080p footage and 4K footage from their Panasonic GH4 looked indistinguishable. Yeah definitely stick to 24fps (or 30 if that’s the closest). I'll download 1080p versions of media, and depending on the content, will choose between a high bitrate large file for content with lots of high-speed action, to lower bit rate for more There is no correct answer. With the Series S, he can actually buy it himself and I thought it would still look great on a 4k tv. That would probably be a very good choice if it fits in your budget and you want to go DLP. I'm starting to think it's finally time to upgrade. Although what I do notice is that the 4k tv does do an incredible job at upscaling 1080p content, making it look much clearer than if your playing on a 1080p screen. I haven't pulled the trigger on a 4K TV yet because from what I've seen, the difference at that size + sitting distance actually seems marginal, and OLED is dropping in price by the week. If i turn off the HDR it will look washed out and now the 1080p version looks a ton better. Linus tech tips does a great video on how 1080p can look almost as good as 4K with a proper bit rate. 4k has more chroma sub samples like they said here, so it’s better for everything from lowlight to giving extra cropping pixels. I had a 1080p 3D TV and it could upscale 720p very, very well. For a decent 65" 4K television, you need to sit closer than , say, 8 feet from the TV to see the difference between 1080p and 4k. Wait till the tech for 4k matures to be able to handle more than 60hz and for the price to be much lower, to go for it. If bit rates are ok for a 4k video web-dl is the way to go. I don't care that [thing I can't afford to run] looks better than [thing I can afford to run]. When I moved I sold my screen and got a 120" 1. 1440p to 4k not really. How good your PS4 looks on a 4k tv depends on the quality of the upscaler in the tv. Not sure what you're trying to argue here. At these prices, I can get a nice 65" 4K for cheaper than a 55" OLED. Check out Rting’s “What is the Resolution?” article. For him, his 1080p tv would probably be just fine. X265 is far more capable than avc/x264 so consider that too. Playing Uncharted 4 at 1080p native gives me around 50-70 FPS but when I set it to 4K with DLSS at performance mode the framerates hover around 25-35 FPS. a 4K 120 or 144hz monitor will set you back at least $500 USD for it. To my understanding using DLSS to upscale to 4K should result in similar FPS levels as native 1080p as performance mode renders at 1080p as a base and then upscales to 4K. However, not that many games run at 1440p, most of them tend to be around 1080p. As far as playing 1080 on 4K is concerned, I researched a bit and realized that Nvidia DLSS on RTX cards, or AMD's FSR using Magpie, or Nvidia's NIS turn out to be very helpful in upscaling 1080p to 4K and you get atleast native 1080p quality image on 4K. Could be the Pixel Mapping. I just bought this tv a few days ago when it was on sale for $149. Went to upgrade to a 4K TV when I got my PS5… and when I went to pack up my 1080p TV, it turned out it was a 720p TV all along. I'd imagine consoles have a much higher adoption rate though since TVs have taken on the 4k trend much earlier. getting a 4K tv. But other than the available colours, and the 1080p/4k resolution differences, are there any other differences between the models? I play on 4k TV, mclassic upscales 720p to 1080p, tv 4:1 up to 4k. Love it every time I turn it on. An considering 4k has 4 times the pixels 1080p has, you will need 4 times the processing power, which absolutely will increase latency. Just so you know, I NEEDED to buy a 4K capable video card cause 1080p was unacceptably ugly on it. Or set it to 1080p, have the Xbox upscale it to 1080p and then the TV to 4k? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth getting the newest gpu's and getting a 4k monitor or just going with a last gen gpu and 1440p monitor. It's truly only a great 4k image when ypu spent into the thousands . Hello , I've recently bought a new gaming pc with a 3060ti / I5 -12400F / 16GB ram and can't really afford a new monitor for now . Generally speaking, which media would give a better picture on my Samsung 4k TV: streaming 4k content from Prime, Netflix, etc, or an HD Blu-Ray disc on a Blu-Ray player. It heavily depends on the movie/show. You will only get more for your money as time passes. 1080p looks quite good, and while the upgrade to 4K does show a benefit, most of that benefit comes with 4K HDR sources, not from upscaled 1080p sources. I store 4K movies on my S21 ultra and I have the phone set to 1080p. How is this possible? I'm watching on a 65" TV and 8 feet distance. My current 4K TV can upscale from 1080p very well. 976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4. 4k gives better depth and detail from the correct seating distance, but the benefits of a HD projector outweighs the benefit I searched for this question a bit and found that a lot of questions regarding video revolved around the 1080p 60 FPS versus the 4K 30 FPS debate. Which would produce smoother video while recording on a An Apple TV 4K stream is usually very good and I might be more inclined to go with that stream. Generally speaking, a 4K HDR stream has the potential to provide a superior viewing experience equal to or greater than a 1080p Blu disc. A lot of people use 140" screens but at 9 feet viewing distance you might start seeing the difference between 1080P and 4K. I have a BenQ HT2050a (1080p) too and the experience is highly cinematic already with bight and clear pictures that I don't think 4k is going to add that much more. 4K device connected to 1080p TV = 4K Playback 1080p Device Connected to a 4K TV = 1080p Playback I have tested this with Apple TV 4K, Roku 4K devices and Fire TV 4K devices. And then you need a tv and carrier to provide the 4K stream. Leave PS3 on 720p for better framerate and compatibility, avoid PS3 defaulting to 480p for non 1080p games. The eshift will also apply to 1080p content but 4K content still looks better. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Many folks don't understand poor performin Yes because a 4k image scaled down to 1080p still looks a good bit better than a 1080p native image and you'll still have access to improved visuals that don't rely on resolution (like raytracing, better draw distances, improved frame rates), super fast load times, the dual sense features (which are pretty damn cool) and I'm sure plenty of other things j can't think of off the top of my head. 2 bps vs 17gb files with 2. Not sure if many 4K TVs support integer scaling (it would be nice). All I can say is, the 1080p Remux is guaranteed to look good while the 4K WEB-DL will be a hit or miss. Edit: I dont think most people commenting read your whole post. My Xbox 360 looks amazing on my 55" 4K TV and 1080p. rtings. I’ve spent most of my gaming time on a 720p TV and couldn’t tell a difference. The other option would be to find an older 1080P model if you can close to $1000. Now on my samsung, which doesn't do HDR very well. Our TV is a 60" 1080P IPS LCD from a few years back, and games look stunning on it. you can run 1440p on a 4k using upscaling, same performance as 1440p but looks a lot better and the UI is full res. Of course those cameras aren't used professionally and are only intended to be sold to people who don't know better. Definitely 4k web-dl. Audio is more often uncompressed formats on disc and more often compressed formats on streams. 1080p Blu-ray is ok too, Blu-ray is usually far more better at audio quality tho. 5” viewing distance, the human eye can discern a difference between 1080p and 4K on a 28” screen or larger. 2160P streaming from Prime at the full bitrate definitely looks better than 1080P Blu-Ray. 1 (which many brand new sets come with), you can play 4k @ 60hz which is WAY better than 1080 @ 120hz. If you were sitting 12' away from a 150" diagonal image, then the sharpness difference between 1080p Blu-ray and 4K Blu-ray will become far more significant and visible to most viewers. The DTS HD-MA or Dolby TrueHD track on a Blu-ray will hands down beat the quality of compressed streaming audio tracks. I know some other genres like shooters, most pros prefer 1080p or 1440p over 4k. in the game settings is where you can enable DLSS, usually after you set the game resolution. r/tcltvs. I've watched 1080p content from both Blu-Ray and streaming sources and I'm surprised the artifacts from the upscaling are so minimal. The 1080p is for remote streaming and sharing with family. Don’t get me wrong, regular Blu-rays can look phenomenal and can beat most 4K streams (although not all regular Blu-rays are equal in quality). TV upscaling looks good but it's not a huge improvement over 1080p It’s a misguided opinion. Oct 30, 2024 · The main difference between 1080p and 4K resolution is the number of pixels displayed on the screen. My 4k options now are px727 px747 px701 and uhd506 or 1080p tw6600 tw6700W epson. 2 screen and it made a big difference with HDR. Switch to 60 or 120 if shooting in slow-mo. to sum it up for Red Dead Redemption 2: if you get a 4k screen and run it at 4k, you get pre-TAA era 1080p clarity You can play ANY resolution up to 2160p on a 4k tv, while you are limited to ONLY 1080 and below on a 1080p TV. However I've been told that 4k monitors for gaming, aren't really worth it compared a QHD (2560x 1440) monitor with a high refresh rate. New comments cannot be posted. HEVC and AV1 can maintain a lot more 4k quality at higher compression rates than H. For my 4k I use Infuse on my AppleTV which is hardwired. That’s the stuff I’ve spent my money on. Its saved my skin a few times lol. So, a bit embarrasing, but I have a UHD 4K 55 inch TV, and often on it I cannot tell the difference between a 1080p upscaled image and a native 4K image, at least not at 3 meters difference. Something over Pik TV is usually pretty bad and I’d definitely opt for the Blu-Ray. 1080p remix is usually around 35GB, depends on the 4k movies but a lot of mine are in the 70gb range, some can be way more but usually not less than 60. I had the 4k package but when they increased the amount payable PCM i thought there isn't much worth watching in 4k, as everything i usually watch seems to be 1080p, so i dropped to the HD package. Plus, imo projectors have that tangible vinyl record like aspect that TVs don't. You would need a flippin big screen to see 8K. That’s the fps most movies shoot in (with TV at 30 fps) and it’s the fps that is most similar to the motion blur you get from the human eye. Who knows where you might put that TV later. There’s a certain distance you have to be with the screen a certain size, in order to actually see the difference between 2k and 4k. HDR will 'pop' more and make a more noticeable improvement than 4K will most likely. 264. I am basing this on comparison with my LG OLE 4k TV. This only depends on the quality of the display or there is no real difference between those 2 resolutions to play Switch as long as the display quality be decent ? Down-sampling: When I shoot 4k and down-sample to 1080p, I get a much better and cleaner 1080p image. I was blown away by TLOU2 and GOT… GOW. We drive the TV through a HTPC, which runs in 1080p, despite being able to deliver 4K at 60Hz. In fact a lot of 4k screens look washed out at that size. 1080p 240Hz will be better in competitive games (Apex, Valorant,) In pretty much everything else (other games, browsing, productivity,) the 4k 144Hz monitor is much better than the 1080p 240Hz monitor. If you're not going for a 4K player any time soon, get the projector. 5 bps look more or less the same. Edit: If you don't have the tech then you just don't know. Remember though, the jump in color depth and HDR can add enough to the experience to make 4K look a fair bit better than 1080p. Once I watch the movie they are deleted and a 1080p is added to my main. The 4k library is only for local streaming on my LAN. And Imo with a distance of about 50-60cm from the screen 1080p at 24“ is a bit blurry compared to 2K, so on bigger screens definitely 2K+ Yes, I know, 4k DLSS looks significantly worse than 4K Native. Luckily we aren’t having much debate about that anymore as the latest iPhones can shoot in 4K 60 FPS. You won't really notice the difference between 4k and 1080p at normal distances but HDR is the real deal. For comparison, i have 1080p native, using internal res 720p vs 960p. I am happy with 8 feet viewing distance on a 100 inch screen with As you said, the video quality can go one way or the other with 1080p Blu-ray vs 4K streaming depending on the context. I have a earlier Hisense 4K tv which for watching movies is great I have a Samsung Blu-Ray player that upscales to 4K so the TV's upscalers isn't used, but TV only has 4K at 30hz so for gaming it has input lag but I can see the difference between my Blu-Rays on my TV verses a normal 1080p TV. The difference between 1080p and 4K depends on the size of your TV/monitor and the distance you are sitting from it. They all behave the same way. on the flip side a 4K TV will be of no use as the systems you listed are for ~1080p gaming, the ps4 can deliver 4K youtube and netflix so theres that However, LinusTechTips has a great video about 4K vs 1080p. A single one of those 4k to 4k transcodes can be really tough on servers even when they are using hardware acceleration. 4K is worth it if you are looking at a 55 inch TV, however 1080p also looks pretty much fine with anti-aliasing if you are sitting on normal distance and not too close. Your instructor probably watched 4K on a 1080p display and is now convinced that there's no difference. These days I can't imagine not getting a 4k, unless it's a HUGE price difference. A lot of movies are being released in 4K now, if you plan on buying a capable player in the next year or 2 I would go for the TV. My dilemma isn't just 1080p OLED vs 4K LED; it's also screen size. Each step up is roughly doubling the number of pixels, there's definitely a point of diminishing returns. 1080p is the best for budget conscious users while 1440p is the choice to upgrade as it strikes the balance of being better than 1080p but still not that expensive as 4k as for now. Kind of a garbage in/garbage out scenario. Because of the downsampling, you end up with much smoother but still sharp images, with fewer jagged edges, due to the downsampling. The major variables include your TV, your streaming platform and/or device, internet speed and related equipment, access, provider and location. 8m away I couldn't even tell the difference between 1080p or 4k, even up close the TV did a good enough upscaling job that there weren't any articating around text even at 1440p that doesn't match 4k so good as 1080p does. If your TV supports HDR then get whatever version has HDR. It can take advantage of those colors and contrast to make 1080p look better than it otherwise would if you were feeding it 1080p content. If it doesn't have HDMI 2. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: subreddit:subreddit find submissions in "subreddit" author:username find submissions by "username" site:example. Or check it out in the app stores Playing native 1440p or 1080p on a 4k TV looks noticeably less Converting 4k HDR content to SDR usually also means it's going to 1080p SDR. If you go larger than this. This will output 4k signal to your TV. Here's the ultimate comparison. The 3060 doesn’t meet the recommended requirements for 1080p so it definitely falls a bit short of the recommended 3080 for 4k. The only difference is clarity and sharpness in picture quality. This is because you are just removing the extra pixels to get to that point. I’ve been experimenting recently with different bitrates, resolutions 2k vs 4k etc and I can’t seem understand what exactly make my viewing experience better. For audio, it's no competition. I ask this under the assumption that the 4k content would be degraded somewhat by the time it got to my TV. I sit about 10 feet away for movies and TV streaming, closer for gaming. Going from 1080p to 4k is going to make a huge difference in clarity. rtx 4080 1080p vs 4k comments When you export a video as 1080p instead of 4k, it will look identical to your 1080p native footage. And without a 4K/HDR capable TV, you won't see the true capability of a One X. I've never owned a 4K TV until a few days ago. I have satellite tv , a super fast fiber internet connection a 4K tv and yet I only get a 1080p signal when I watch f1 racing via the app. Where as a 400 doller gaming monitor that's only 1080p will look leaps better. If you are considering spending the same price, which it sounds like, get the 4K set. I ended up downgrading to the HD plan and haven't missed the 4k experience. Those people are in the minority though. I have a Samsung QLED 👍 I have a cheap 4k 75" TV and I could notice the difference but eventually I just got used to it and didn't appreciate the FHD. 4k vs 1080p is something like 1080p vs 480p. Not too terribly hard to drive compared to 1080p and it definitely looks noticeably better plus 144hz doesn't exist yet for 4k (despite 60fps still being incredibly hard to get at reasonable settings) so higher than 60fps is also noticeably smoother and crisper pixels all adds up to an ideal for now. Also, if you like Alien Covenant that much, you could sell the regular Blu-ray and purchase the 4K Blu-ray which usually includes the regular 1080p Blu-ray as well. I've seen the same effect on other 4k movies when compared to 1080p ones. While it’s true that in a strict resolution sense 4K and 1080p are nearly indistinguishable at normal viewing distance on “smaller” (I don’t personally think 48 is small at all) TVs, they don’t take into account that the increased pixel-to-pixel contrast oled provides, and HDR resolves does make for a significant picture improvement beyond just being able Honestly, audio is the biggest deciding factor for me. 960p texture definitely more crisp, but unless you're super nitpick about the details you won't easy notice the differences. My PS4 Pro looked great on my 4k tv even though it was using checkerboard a lot of the time. upscaling was made to optimize running lower resolutions on a monitor, it intelligently scales up to the monitor res whereas running a lower resolution as a whole uses simple scaling I go with x264 1080p at around 15-20GB per movie for everything (because you can very much see the difference on a good 4k screen), and an x265 4k version at around 20-30GB per movie for a specific subset (sci-fi, fantasy, etc that uses a lot of fx) using a second radarr. Started with a 42” 768p LCD, upgraded to a 60” 1080p, then a 75” 4K. However, you can use display scaling resolutions to play at higher resolutions on a 1080p screen and see better graphics. My reason besides hdd space saving for encoding to 1080p with HDR is simply down to how highly I rank the movie, a favourite will always be in 2160p but a less notable movie from my If this was 4K downscales to 1080p vs native 1080p it would be a different answer, but that is not what you are asking. com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationship. For me 1440p upscaled to 4k looks crystal clear on Series S. I game and watch movies and shows on it all the time but am starting to prefer watching animated content and gaming on my 4K tv just because it has that extra pop with taa, 1440p and 4k screens became redundant. If the version options are just 1080p BDRip or 4K Webrip then really your only option is to actually compare the two. Purely talking from a quality standpoint, even on a 1080p screen, A 4K will look better than its 1080p counterpart (considering that both have relatively high bitrates with good I absolutely enjoy watching 4k Dolby Vision/HDR and the added benefit of Atmos. 5k screen. For a 4K TV, 720p or 1080p? For a few days now I've been thinking: Should I set the 360 to 720p since a good majority don't even pass said resolution and let my TV do the upscaling from there?. If i compare 2 movies the 4k HDR will look a ton better. The TCL is about 30 dollars cheaper and the size seems a little more appropriate for a bedroom TV but I can't help but wonder if the 4K TV would be a better investment, even if it's kind of huge and a little more expensive. Some 4K content also has HDR data and that is a game changer. You might have problems if the bitrate is too low and downsampled 4K should still be sharper. In fact, using a 1080p projector, which supports a 4K input, I have heard yields better results than using a 1080p native source. at least you can still run native 1080p as a last resort. Even in modern games like God of War on the PS4 Pro or Gears of War Ultimate on Xbox one X. Steam Hardware survey puts 4k at ~ 2. Or you need to try streaming Apple TV+ shows on an Apple TV 4K. TBH 60hz vs 144hz is often the biggest difference of what you listed, at least if you actually play at high fps to match it. For the longest time I was using a GTX 1050Ti with my LG C1 OLED 55", no issues with 1080p at all from about 1. Do I go for the 1080p and its higher bitrate and trust the upscaling of the TV/dongle to do its job, or do I go for the web-dl and its "native" resolution? Example: The Truman Show: 1080p Remux - MPEG-4 AVC Video 35825 kbps 1080p / 23. The question is, is it noticeable for the hardware you’re having The option will be available on updated 4K-compatible streaming devices and delivers our highest video quality. But there’s some 4K streaming content I’ve seen that even beats many 4K Blu-rays in quality. For example, almost every Marvel movie ever made (except Black Panther) has only a 2K master. The 1080p model is newer and has better hardware for transcoding more codecs. In my humble opinion, from everything I’ve seen in person and read, I wouldn’t buy a 4K TV unless it’s 55” and up. Not to 4k SDR. currently i am using tw5200 with 100 inch projection white screen in dark room (10 feet viewing distance), i am planning to sell my tw5200 and spend another 300$ to buy a new projector. I’d say the majority don’t care. I’d consider a 49”-50” 4K TV if you are viewing from no more than 6 feet away. That's why the black panther 4K blu ray looks so good is because it was filmed with a totally different camera with a true 4K master. Any TV will upscale from the previous resolution to its current resolution very, very well so a projector is a headache with no real payoff besides a BIG picture but 1080p blown up that big will just look blurry on top of the problems I listed already. First I tried 1440p which was very good… but 4K on a big tv…. I currently have 2 monitors, a 1080p and a 4K, I'm wondering if it would be better to record the 1080p one with the native output res, Or recording on the 4K monitor with 1080p output? Locked post. They found that they could, however, tell the difference on their $10 000 camera. That said, the only difference in 4k isn't just pixels; you can also have Dolby Vision and HDR, which can also greatly improve picture quality: color range and differences in the lights/darks (some 1080p TVs could have that, but it's not as common). There are some PS3 games that actually run at 1080p. Sep 24, 2024 · 4K vs 1080p – Is UHD Worth The Upgrade? 4K Ultra HD (UHD) comes with four times as much screen real estate than 1080p, but it also has its drawbacks. Filming 1080p @60fps vs 4k @30fps. Use that set for a few years and then get a really good 4K model in a few years. I wouldn't even consider the 4k version if I had a 1080 TV as Google is supposed to release a new model chromecast soonish. The good news is that 4K is exactly 4x the amount of pixels of 1080p (not including slight variations in resolution), that means there will be 4 pixels in 4k for 1080p content. To OP, if you have a good 4K TV then 1080p 120 will look and run great. 8 inch screen. A 1080p TV will look no better than a 4K TV for 1080p content, and I would imagine the upscaling algorithms on modern 4K tvs would produce better images than any older [Opinion] 720p vs 1080p on a 4k TV? General Discussion Knowing that most xbox games run at 720P and are internally upscaled to 1080p, would setting an internal resolution of 720P and letting the display handle the rest yield better output? A 1080 p picture can run circles around an average 4 k tv . ** I will amend this. I am sat 8. Definitely not the budget minded gamer at this point and anyone looking at 4K already knows the money they are spending. I think the biggest difference is in the image itself with things like hdr and oled giving a lerger percivable difference. I grew up playing games on a black and white TV and went through all the refresh rates and the more frames the better. true. I don't even bother to switch it to 1440p and that's on a 6. So I definitely do recommend getting one soon, i just hope devs don't abandon 1080p since i want the most graphical details while also games run at 60fps. For me, it’s a HUGE difference, but it may depend on the size of your monitor However, if you are getting a new TV then you should just go for the 4K. upscaling is superior to running the whole thing at a lower res. Playing a 1080p video is a different thing though. But honestly, it sounds more like you're trying to justify staying on your 1080p TV versus possibly using the 4K family TV. For example, this is a 1080p show, presumably upscaled by the TV and the detail is genuinely impressive. 1 A gaming quality 4K monitor does also run more expensive compared to 1440p or 1080p counter parts. For example, i had read that smaller tvs like a 43 inch at 4k would have higher pixel density than one with the same resolution but a larger screen, but others claim that you can't see the difference of 4k unless your tv is at least 65 inches. Yes, at 44. Personally I don't think 4k does much over 1440p for movie watching at couch distance, but a 4k monitor My thoughts and way to go for now is some monitor (or tv ) up to 1080p because Switch is just 1080p but I still reading time to time that Switch looks better on 4k than in 1080p. I cannot see the difference between 1080p and 4K on a decent Netflix stream. The cameras, the stream both on the input side and the output side. I'm aware that I'll have to make certain sacrifices graphically if I go with 4K (no Cyberpunk Path-tracing for me), plus I may have to resort to things like FG, DLSS Balanced or even Performance in some games where I wouldn't have to go below Quality if I were on 1440p. But there are people who do know and understand the difference. I would think the opposite. The details you get, especially at higher shooting distance is not negligible. I don't play non HDR 4k Movies, if a movie i have is 4k is comes with HDR. DLSS affects the render resolution in the GPU processing not to the output resolution to the display, your monitor or TV doesn’t care about DLSS since the GPU will output a 1440p video signal even if internally is rendering the frames at a lower resolution. This is why many 1080p/HDR capable projectors can look a good deal better when fed 4K video vs. Haven’t hooked up my PS4 to it yet, but HD content from my nVidia Shield looks good. I added 2 years of Geek Squad protection for $20. Many 4K WEB-DL's are bit-starved fake upscales with awful HDR grading so the Blu-ray version will be superior. I would look at the new 4k version when it gets released and when I got a 4k TV 1440p is the best price/pixel ratio right now. Quite bright at 22,00 lumens. But I do notice a difference in 4k video and 1080p on youtube when I switch it. I've had my new TV a week now (x900h) and I'm super impressed with demo videos, YouTube 4k HDR videos and videos with the intention to show off a display but I'm a little underwhelmed by actual shows and movies. If you're watching 1080p content on a 4K TV, it's going to look worse than 1080p on a 1080p TV because the resolution of the image is not the native resolution of the TV, the pixels don't align perfectly giving an image that's blurrier than it would otherwise be. BTW I use a 50" 1080p TV with 120" 1080p Projector in my home theater (we fire up the projector 2-3x a week) and I also use a 43" 4k panel as my daily driver for computer use - with lots of video viewed that way as well. 16 votes, 33 comments. I've spent plenty of time with my brothers TV, and while the picture quality is amazing in comparison, the size is way more fun on movie night. 4%, 1080p sits at ~67% and 1440p at ~8%. It seems like you have problems elsewhere. If you care a lot about visuals and have a high end TV, it's worth it but to me I didn't get enough out of it. 24 votes, 94 comments. However I’m curious if you believe the competitive gaming scene is going to prefer 1080p over 4k. Cropping: If I have a shot in 1080p that I need to crop, the image breaks apart. The closer you are, that definitely helps, but going from 32” to 43”, I doubt you’ll see a noticeable difference. jwbhkx rpbagin uweixdxx gctvb ssg smu nszpeck djv cbtg uqhby